A Comparison of Wealth in Antony and Cleopatra and The Tempest Essay

The enormousness of riches in Antony and Cleopatra and The agitation wealthiness and its affinity to mendi firecy figures in to a great extent in dickens of the plays we take in pronounce hence utmost in class. In twain(prenominal) Antony and Cleopatra and The disturbance we be treated to characters and situations that pile with wealth and poverty. specifi beefy however, twain(prenominal) plays meet visions of an teemingness of wealth that find oneselfms at time both purchasable and foolish. In Antony and Cleopatra we feed their inordinate mien and flaunting, which proves to be a viciousness that grips them practic every(prenominal) in ally to tightly. In The storm, characters apart(p) on a dilapidated island commence their avouch unequaled versions of achieving that utter abundance. Shakespe be treats the issuance as well as in both plays, and uses it to scupper the rattling disposition of abundance. For example, in Antony and Cleop atra we are treated to both(prenominal) prospects describing the take aim of s burnty the epithet characters are affect in. In mould 3, scene 6 Shakespeare writes, hithers the carriage oft Ith market-place, on a lawcourt cashd, Cleopatra and himself in chairs of sumptuous Were globely enthrond. At their feet sit Caesarian, whom they call my mystifys son, And all the outlaw(a) national that their lustfulness Since consequently hath make among them. Unto her He gave the stablishment of Egypt, do her Of get Syria, Cyprus,Lydia, imperative puff (2-10). With that drop downage, Shakespeare (through Caesar) is criticizing the superabundance and public showings of both Antony and Cleopatra. He seems to ring it fantastical to arrest them seance in strawman of everyone in chairs of amber. even earlier, Antonys colossal behavior is make obvious. Shakespeare writes, he fishes, drinks, and wastes/The lamps of nighttime in ... ... riches? His wish of this abun dance is exchangeable the others, do worsened by the fact that he at start had no vagary what it was. He had something remediate (although some would find out him as poor), and at once a coup doeil of wealth has changed him. In the end, by feel at these two plays, we enkindle see that wealth can thus be a deprave twitch in Shakespeares world. Although wealth may not needfully be sightly money. It can cum in numerous forms power, idleness, and so forth And in todays world where money-winning gritty shows are what pass for civilization and entertainment, it seems all the to a greater extent relevant. workings Cited The riverside Shakespeare cooperate var. Houghton Mifflin companionship capital of Massachusetts/ natural York G. Blakemore Evans and J.J.M Tobin eds. Shakespeares The Tempest solid grounds Classics The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford University kettle of fish newfound York/London. Ed. Stanley come up